But the report is nothing more than whitewash, because in it nothing of the decades-long U.S. agenda to support the lucrative Drug trafficking in the Golden Triangle is said
Paul Joseph Watson, 28.10.2009, Prisonplanet.com
[freely translated from http://www.propagandaschock.blogspot.com]
A sensational article in the Today's edition of the New York Times offers insights into how the brother of Afghan President Hamid Karzai, a suspected size in the booming opium trade of the country for 8 years was on the payroll of the CIA. The article is little more than a whitewash because it failed to address is the fact that one of the main reasons behind the invasion of Afghanistan in 2001, the Agenda was the drug trade in the Golden Triangle to re-establish.
"The agency paid (Ahmed Wali) Karzai for a variety of services, including assisting in the recruitment of Afghan paramilitary units, which operate under orders from the CIA in and around the city of Kandahar, Mr. Karzai's home." Said the Times .
A report by October 2008, the Times revealed as is done. For example, in 2004 after security forces found a large trailer load of heroin on the outskirts of Kandahar, "Soon after, the commander Habibulla Jan a telephone call received by the brother of President Hamid Karzai, Ahmed Wali Karzai, who told him the vehicle . To be granted with the drugs'
2006, after another charge of heroin was found: "Investigators of the United States told other American officials that they had discovered links between the drug shipment and a bodyguard, is believed to that it is an intermediary for Ahmed Wali Karzai is. "
The Times article from today describes how the CIA has used Karzai as an intermediary between the Americans and the Taliban. Karzai is also directly linked to the wrong ballots and polling stations in connection which the controversial election of the President are allocated.
"If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it probably is a duck. "said an American official of Mr. Karzai. "Our assumption that he benefited from drug trafficking."
officials describe cited by the Times Karzai as a mafia figure who has expanded its influence on drug trafficking with the aid of U.S. efforts to eliminate its competitors.
The opium trade in Afghanistan since the U.S. invasion, exploded after a lull since the Taliban was happening to tough measures against the opium trade. How the United Nations reports, the trade currently amounts to 65 billion USD. Afghanistan produces 92% of the world's opium, was 3,500 tons, the year the Country exit of vehicles. Other sources put the number higher on the 6,100 tons per year.
The report of the New York Times pushed the blame Karzai in his shoes. It fails however to explain that one of the main reasons was the agenda behind the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan in 2001 to eradicate the opium trade, but not restore.
worked before the invasion, the Taliban closely with the United Nations together to opium production to only 185 tonnes of creosote, a number that 2000% below the current level is. The comment that "Taliban benefit from drug trafficking" and that The U.S. is trying to stop this, like Bush and Obama argued, is the exact opposite of what really happened.
How Professor Michel Chossudovsky in a series of papers emphasized is it is the explosion in opium production to a push by CIA the lucrative opium trade in the Golden Triangle to revive that existed at that time when the agency the Mujahideen rebels for the fight against the Soviets funded and the streets of America and Britain with cheap heroin flooded and destroyed by life, while making obscene profits.
The Times suggests that the drug lord Karzai on the CIA payroll, no more than a embarrassing coincidence, although it really is just a middle manager for control over the drug trade in Afghanistan, the military-industrial complex of the U.S., which dates back decades and only interrupted was when the Taliban came to power.
"Heroin is a powerful interests supported by multi-billion dollar business that requires a steady and secure flow of trade goods. One of the "hidden" objectives of the war was precisely those revival of CIA drug trafficking based on the previous levels and exercise direct control over the drug routes writes Chossudovsky.
"How in the Iran-Contra and Bank of Commerce and Credit International (BCCI) scandals came to light, the CIA financed its covert operations in support of the Afghan mujahideen through the laundering of drug money. "Dirty money" was - by a number of banking institutions (in the Middle East) as well as through anonymous CIA front companies - in "covert money," recycled and used to finance various rebel groups during the Soviet-Afghan war and its aftermath. "
Within two years of CIA covert operations in Afghanistan," CIA forces control again this heroin trade. As the Mujahideen in the territory of Afghanistan demolished in themselves, they ordered peasants impoverished opium as a revolutionary tax to grow. On the other side of the border in Pakistan operated Afghan leaders and local associations, hundreds of heroin laboratories under the protection of Pakistani intelligence. During this decade overt drug trafficking denied the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration in Islamabad and could not launch a major seizure or detention. "
This is the story of the Afghan drug trade, the Times will not tell. And is used by this failure of today's article only as whitewashing of the true scale of the agenda behind the U.S. occupation of Afghanistan.
.
"The agency paid (Ahmed Wali) Karzai for a variety of services, including assisting in the recruitment of Afghan paramilitary units, which operate under orders from the CIA in and around the city of Kandahar, Mr. Karzai's home." Said the Times .
A report by October 2008, the Times revealed as is done. For example, in 2004 after security forces found a large trailer load of heroin on the outskirts of Kandahar, "Soon after, the commander Habibulla Jan a telephone call received by the brother of President Hamid Karzai, Ahmed Wali Karzai, who told him the vehicle . To be granted with the drugs'
2006, after another charge of heroin was found: "Investigators of the United States told other American officials that they had discovered links between the drug shipment and a bodyguard, is believed to that it is an intermediary for Ahmed Wali Karzai is. "
The Times article from today describes how the CIA has used Karzai as an intermediary between the Americans and the Taliban. Karzai is also directly linked to the wrong ballots and polling stations in connection which the controversial election of the President are allocated.
"If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it probably is a duck. "said an American official of Mr. Karzai. "Our assumption that he benefited from drug trafficking."
officials describe cited by the Times Karzai as a mafia figure who has expanded its influence on drug trafficking with the aid of U.S. efforts to eliminate its competitors.
The opium trade in Afghanistan since the U.S. invasion, exploded after a lull since the Taliban was happening to tough measures against the opium trade. How the United Nations reports, the trade currently amounts to 65 billion USD. Afghanistan produces 92% of the world's opium, was 3,500 tons, the year the Country exit of vehicles. Other sources put the number higher on the 6,100 tons per year.
The report of the New York Times pushed the blame Karzai in his shoes. It fails however to explain that one of the main reasons was the agenda behind the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan in 2001 to eradicate the opium trade, but not restore.
worked before the invasion, the Taliban closely with the United Nations together to opium production to only 185 tonnes of creosote, a number that 2000% below the current level is. The comment that "Taliban benefit from drug trafficking" and that The U.S. is trying to stop this, like Bush and Obama argued, is the exact opposite of what really happened.
How Professor Michel Chossudovsky in a series of papers emphasized is it is the explosion in opium production to a push by CIA the lucrative opium trade in the Golden Triangle to revive that existed at that time when the agency the Mujahideen rebels for the fight against the Soviets funded and the streets of America and Britain with cheap heroin flooded and destroyed by life, while making obscene profits.
The Times suggests that the drug lord Karzai on the CIA payroll, no more than a embarrassing coincidence, although it really is just a middle manager for control over the drug trade in Afghanistan, the military-industrial complex of the U.S., which dates back decades and only interrupted was when the Taliban came to power.
"Heroin is a powerful interests supported by multi-billion dollar business that requires a steady and secure flow of trade goods. One of the "hidden" objectives of the war was precisely those revival of CIA drug trafficking based on the previous levels and exercise direct control over the drug routes writes Chossudovsky.
"How in the Iran-Contra and Bank of Commerce and Credit International (BCCI) scandals came to light, the CIA financed its covert operations in support of the Afghan mujahideen through the laundering of drug money. "Dirty money" was - by a number of banking institutions (in the Middle East) as well as through anonymous CIA front companies - in "covert money," recycled and used to finance various rebel groups during the Soviet-Afghan war and its aftermath. "
Within two years of CIA covert operations in Afghanistan," CIA forces control again this heroin trade. As the Mujahideen in the territory of Afghanistan demolished in themselves, they ordered peasants impoverished opium as a revolutionary tax to grow. On the other side of the border in Pakistan operated Afghan leaders and local associations, hundreds of heroin laboratories under the protection of Pakistani intelligence. During this decade overt drug trafficking denied the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration in Islamabad and could not launch a major seizure or detention. "
This is the story of the Afghan drug trade, the Times will not tell. And is used by this failure of today's article only as whitewashing of the true scale of the agenda behind the U.S. occupation of Afghanistan.
.
0 comments:
Post a Comment